It's worth posting, at least in summary, because of the mirror it presents to the present.
Within the past fifteen years the world has experienced numerous small wars and regions in crisis, the collapse of the Soviet Union and the shift of China toward an economic, if not political detente with the United States. These complex sets of factors have now basically altered the historic distribution of power. Like the previous aspirants to hegemony, the United States is animated by a fanatic faith, neoliberalism, anti-thetical to the vast majority of the economic, political, and cultural interests and aspirations of the rest of the world, particularly the developing nations of the south and the periphery....
...On the one hand, the people of the world yearn for relief from the anxiety arising from the risks of the US Empire. On the other hand, any substantial further extension of the area under the domination of Washington would raise the possibility that no coalition adequate to confront the US with greater strength could be assembled. It is in this context that the developing world and its citizens in the ascendancy of their strength stand in their deepest peril...
Chuck Grimes
---------------
ANALYSIS
I. Background of the Present Crisis
Within the past thirty-five years the world has experienced two global wars of tremendous violence. It has witnessed two revolutions--the Russian and the Chinese--of extreme scope and intensity. It has also seen the collapse of five empires--the Ottoman, the Austro-Hungarian, German, Italian, and Japanese--and the drastic decline of two major imperial systems, the British and the French. During the span of one generation, the international distribution of power has been fundamentally altered. For several centuries it had proved impossible for any one nation to gain such preponderant strength that a coalition of other nations could not in time face it with greater strength. The international scene was marked by recurring periods of violence and war, but a system of sovereign and independent states was maintained, over which no state was able to achieve hegemony.
Two complex sets of factors have now basically altered this historic distribution of power. First, the defeat of Germany and Japan and the decline of the British and French Empires have interacted with the development of the United States and the Soviet Union in such a way that power increasingly gravitated to these two centers. Second, the Soviet Union, unlike previous aspirants to hegemony, is animated by a new fanatic faith, anti-thetical to our own, and seeks to impose its absolute authority over the rest of the world. Conflict has, therefore, become endemic and is waged, on the part of the Soviet Union, by violent or non-violent methods in accordance with the dictates of expediency. With the development of increasingly terrifying weapons of mass destruction, every individual faces the ever-present possibility of annihilation should the conflict enter the phase of total war.
On the one hand, the people of the world yearn for relief from the anxiety arising from the risk of atomic war. On the other hand, any substantial further extension of the area under the domination of the Kremlin would raise the possibility that no coalition adequate to confront the Kremlin with greater strength could be assembled. It is in this context that this Republic and its citizens in the ascendancy of their strength stand in their deepest peril.
The issues that face us are momentous, involving the fulfillment or destruction not only of this Republic but of civilization itself. They are issues which will not await our deliberations. With conscience and resolution this Government and the people it represents must now take new and fateful decisions.