Chomsky on Vietnam

[Bradford DeLong]

>I think it must be conceded that Chomsky's statement only makes
>sense under a relatively narrow definition of "independent," namely
>independent of private capital and socialist to some important extent.
>As capitalism(s) go, SK is as independent as anything else, IMO.
>
>mbs
>

So that to be dependent on Stalin, Krushchev, Brezhnev, or Mao is to 
be independent? All becomes clear now.

Did I ever say that my building at U.C. Berkeley looks *exactly* like 
what I imagine the Ministry of Truth to look like?

Brad DeLong