> Whoa! Where is the evidence. Organic farming often has slightly lower
> yields, which is more than made up for by the lower input requirements.
I do wonder why that article started with the header James gave it as it seems to have little if nothing to do with a decrease in personal income, merely in personal greenhouse-gas production.
Emissions-trading has gone wrong in the past, true, but it's also gone right. More to the point, it gives a financial incentive for things to go right; one not merely forgo large parts of one's personal income, as if your lifestyle was graven in stone.
m.
,--------------------------------------------------------------------------.
> Marco Anglesio | Quidquid latine dictum sit, <
> mpa at the-wire.com | altum viditur. <
> http://www.the-wire.com/~mpa | (Whatever is said in Latin <
> | sounds profound.) <
`--------------------------------------------------------------------------'