autarkic development in USSR (was anti-Semitism)

ChrisD(RJ) chrisd at russiajournal.com
Sun Apr 21 06:18:05 PDT 2002


James Heartfield wrote: I still think Chris is refusing to grasp the nettle: The Soviet economy could hardly be called a national economy. It had no real tendency towards centralisation of resources, nor to create a national division of labour. ----------- Maybe, but that's largely because I don't really know what you mean by "national division of labour."

Chris Doss The Russia Journal



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list