autarkic development in USSR (was anti-Semitism)
ChrisD(RJ)
chrisd at russiajournal.com
Sun Apr 21 06:18:05 PDT 2002
James Heartfield wrote:
I still think Chris is refusing to grasp the nettle: The Soviet economy
could hardly be called a national economy. It had no real tendency
towards centralisation of resources, nor to create a national division
of labour.
-----------
Maybe, but that's largely because I don't really know what you mean by
"national division of labour."
Chris Doss
The Russia Journal
More information about the lbo-talk
mailing list