>billbartlett at dodo.com.au wrote:
> >
> >
> > But Carrol could have spared you confusion by supplying definitions for
> the three classes suggested. This would not be difficult if he has more
> than a vague idea of what these terms are meant to indicate. I would
> certainly be keen to dissect any definition of "petty producer" which
> Carrol might concoct.
>
>
>I doubt that the complexities of class analysis can be conducted on a
>maillist -
thank goodness.
R
>- constantly changing social relations constitute class. I
>simply post a reminder (and am indifferent to how much people mind it)
>once in a while that "middle class" and "petty bourgeoisie" are pretty
>em