"post-leftism"

Tom Wheeler twbounds at pop.mail.rcn.net
Mon Aug 19 08:10:01 PDT 2002


From: <billbartlett at dodo.com.au>
> Whether people are dispersed by violent force or economic force is
irrelevant. Obviously few people are going to freely choose to abandon comfortable lives made possible by modern industrial infrastructure, for a primitive life of subsistence agriculture. They would have to be forced to do it one way or another. Chuck's denials are cowardly and dishonest.
>
> You can drive them out of the cities at the point of a gun, or you can
starve them out. Either way, many millions will die and the rest will become serfs in a new feudal economy. The economic basis of society determines what sort of social system is possible. The most advanced social system possible in an agricultural society, without modern technology, is feudalism.
>
> To advocate destroying the material basis for modern society, which is
also the indispensable material basis for a future socialist society, is insane. To advance such rhetoric in the name of socialism is an intolerable libel against socialists of all stripes.
>
> Chuck's rants against modern industrial means of production are
intrinsically reactionary and anti-social. Such deranged rhetoric should probably be criminalised, their authors thrown in a jail, along with other potential war criminals. The man is dangerous. Like I say, a potential Pol Pot.

Ah yes, another leftist calling for the imprisonment of people for *thought crimes*. Lovely.

In the real world, we have had *forced* industrialization over the past century in many parts of the world. It was often resisted, sometimes violently. Force is also used against folks in the global South to help maintain the comfortable modern industrial society we have in the North. If they walk off the job and a good number of workers in the North join them in solidarity, or if there is a revolution and a number of folks refuse to return to their demeaning jobs, are you going to jail them too since they then pose a threat to your precious lifestyle? Does this mean you support sending in the Marines to protect the *American way of life*? At what point do you support coercion of others in order to maintain your comfortable lifestyle? - Tom



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list