On Monday, August 19, 2002, at 10:11 PM, Kelley wrote:
> At 08:29 PM 8/19/02 -0400, RE wrote:
>> Not sure why this is seen as Lacanian, it could be written by anyone
>> who
>> wants to emphasize the narcissistic aspect of someone's political
>> involvement, or perhaps to characterize that person as a narcissist who
>> cannot engage others except as objects.
>
> so what makes Lacanian political analysis different from conventional
> Freudian analysis. In the hands of quite a few people, Lacanian
> readings aren't much diff. from Freudian readings--at least on this
> list.
unless i'm mistaken--which i admit is quite possible--most good lacanians would consider themselves pretty good freudians . . .
j