> Yup, which is why I never thought it was worth
> the trouble. Maybe I just don't find refuting neoclassical economics worth
the trouble -
it's so ludicrous anyway. Do I have to refute
astrology too?
> Doug
No, you don't have to (although you'd be brill doing it, I'm sure). Steve Keen's book _Debunking Economics_, which Ian mentioned a while back, does it thoroughly and with clarity and precision worthy of you. It even includes and critiques graphical models for those of us turned on by those sorts of things.
Christian