> I feel kind of churlish in pointing
> out
I'll bet he does.
> a hit piece on Lula was called "Brazil's Nut"
Now that's what I call scintillating.
Dreary? Puritanical? Humorless? Out of touch with regular folks? Come on--that shit yet again, for about the millionth time? Right wing pundits have been painting that picture of the left for as long as I can remember. What could be more "dreary" than this guy's piece?
> Snappy and pointed, it's designed to
> compete in a world that has many magazines.
Oh, gimme a break. The Weekly Standard loses money hand over fist, while The Nation just about breaks even. By that measure, The Nation out-competes Murdoch's rag. The Market has spoken!
> "We
> regret any misinterpretation," she said, rather than openly
> apologizing or having the courage to endorse a drawing that many
> readers will find offensive.
Geez, Powers, she was just too polite to say "You are an idiot."
> the senior editors...need to talk to some folks who own guns.
Hey, I own 3 guns, and I think The Nation is swell. Pass that along to Katrina & Co., will you Doug?
Jacob Conrad