Not my intent to exonerate Perle in the least. Shoud have made an explicit comment on my first thought when I read the Raimondo and Jack Shafer columns in Slate http://slate.msn.com/?id=2070190 on l'affaire Murawiec. That both RAND Corp. and Perle et' al. DPRB really showed (not that they haven't always been the most extreme neo-con loons) a lack of judgement and/or bad vetting to let this guy be part of the policy process. Note on Perle> Yrs. ago I spent a few days at the Hoover Institute reading the Bertram Wolfe papers. Wolfe was a former CPUSA cadre in the 20's that was a Lovestoneite in the 30's, knew Trotsky and Frieda Kahlo. One of her letters to him still had traces of her lipstick and she had dipped the letter in perfume. Anyway after I finished with the Wolfe papers with all their references in letters to and from Benjamin Gitlow of the CPUSA to, "furniture, " and, "pianos, " from the USSR to be shipped from Moscow to NYC, which I took to be code for Comintern subsidies aka Moscow Gold http://www.nytimes.com/2000/10/21/opinion/21NAVA.html http://www.yale.edu/ypq/articles/may98/may98c.html http://www.yale.edu/annals/Reviews/review_texts/Filatova_on_the_sovi et_world_Kleio31_1999.htm , I skimmed bound volumes of, "New America, " the newspaper of Social Democrats, U.S.A. http://www.publiceye.org/research/Group_Watch/Entries-118.htm . Perle in the early 70's was a staffer for Henry "Scoop" Jackson, D-Wa. Cold War Liberal Icon. Perle and Walter Laqueur were noted a speakers to SDUSA events. From reading too many books on neo-cons (Blumenthal, Arthur McGovern, John Ehrmann, George Nash and Peter Steinfels are the best.) I sense that Perle was once a mild socialist.
kjkhoo at softhome.net>...Looking at Murawiec's bio, despite (or would that be, because of?) that early round with the LaRoucheites, the rest of it looks pretty much like the kind of CV building that the right- wing foundations excel in and have done so since they got seriously going, back in the 1970s.
Heh, have reading this by him, "The Wacky World of French Intellectuals." http://www.meforum.org/article/37/ http://www.meforum.org/meq/issues/200206 http://www.meforum.org/experts.php Patrick Clawson Iran, Middle East economics patrickc at washingtoninstitute.org (Neo-Con? Ex-marxist? ECONOMARX ... Obituary [The Falling-Rate-of-Profit Theory of Crisis: A Rational Reconstruction by Way of Obituary]., Clawson, Patrick, Review of Radical Political Economics; ... http://www.u-paris10.fr/ActuelMarx/economarx/refe0507.htm )
Michael Pugliese
SPRING 2000 • VOLUME VIII: NUMBER 1
Subscribe | Archive | Submit Manuscript | Board of Editors | Contact Editor
The Wacky World of French Intellectuals by Laurent Murawiec
Whence comes the phenomenon known as fundamentalist Islam or Islamism? Some French analysts from a range of disciplines (international affairs, Orientalism, security studies, journalism) have come to an agreement: it comes from. . . the United States. Despite the inherent implausibility of viewing a movement engaged in a sustained attack on Americans as a diabolical U.S. plot, this argument has considerable persuasive power. It presents Islamism as an American attempt to retard progress in Muslim countries and divide them from their natural allies in Europe. Such ideas come at once from the Right and the Left, representing both nostalgia for the French empire and a residual "Third- Worldism." They have as their common denominator a hatred of the United States and all it stands for. Although still marginal, these ideas about Islamism have spilled over into policy-making circles and have had a skewing effect on French policies toward the Middle East.
America's War on Europe
America is "the last empire" in the view of these analysts, and that explains its aggressive policies. Paul-Marie de la Gorce, a leftist author with a Gaullist perspective on foreign affairs, believes that "the American empire is the only empire in the world today, it is an exclusive hegemony, and it is the first time that such a strange phenomenon occurs in human history."1 According to Senator Pierre Biarnès, in a 1998 book on geopolitics, it is an "unbearable America," a country dead-set on "moral and mercantile hegemony," obsessed with its own "hegemonic design."2
Worse, the United States is a "totalitarian democracy," writes Alexandre del Valle (the pen-name of Arthur Dupont, a French civil servant). It is a lone superpower intent on preventing any other power from emerging and determined to control Europe. Islamism is one whip used against Europe, but there are others:
Washington orchestrated the Asian financial crisis to bring down its dangerous rival Japan, and it uses the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) to control Europe against Europe's interests. "Since the fall of the Berlin Wall, the mutuality of geopolitical and ideological interests that united America and Western Europe against the Soviet bloc seems to have become partly obsolete," del Valle writes in his somewhat convoluted style. In a more straightforward way, he observes that "the United States has launched a war against the Old World."3
The theme of a war between the Old and the New Worlds recurs often. Pierre-Marie Gallois, a retired general, one of the conceptualizers of de Gaulle's doctrine of "all points" nuclear deterrence, and a well-known figure in the French defense community, holds that it is U.S. strategy to subvert European sovereignty (désouverainiser). From this alleged intent stems Washington's desire to place "Europe under German-American military control." The Germans go along with this because "the concept of Europe is an obsession for the Germans," who have always wanted to rule the continent. "In order to build that empire, the nation-states have to be destroyed," Gallois adds, which explains why the United States was set on undermining the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia. France should rebuke the Germans and the Americans, and join with "our traditional allies," Russia and Serbia.
The theme of an American war on Europe has surprisingly wide appeal in elite French circles. François Mitterrand is quoted as saying in private conversation (according to his confidante Georges-Marc Benamou): "France does not know it, but we are at war with America. Yes, a permanent war, a vital war, a war without casualties, at least apparently."4 An opinion piece that appeared on the front page of the most prestigious French daily, co-authored by two members of the European Parliament, sums up the ills of a U.S.-ruled world, where "the market," a "triumphant totalitarianism" which bullies the rest of the world "way beyond the old Kremlin's wildest dreams," has confiscated the sovereignty of nations. The planet is now in the hands of "a mercantile one- worldism" which is the equal of Nazism and Bolshevism, they write. Thankfully, there are "vigorous signs" — the two authors' own exertions, for instance — of resistance to the uniformization of the world imposed by the "American Way of Life."5 They are spokesmen for a heterogeneous coalition of nationalists ranging from Populists of the left and the right to Gaullists, Socialists, and Communists, ultra- Leftists and ultra-Rightists, the whole rag-tag current going under the name of souverainisme.
In short, the United States is dangerous because it is the champion of capitalism and of the lifting of national borders in the interests of a commercial economy. The United States is home to the "new masters of the world," notably multinational corporations which "loot the planet," impose a "sterile uniformity" on it as well as a "streamlined mode of thinking." The influential editor of Le Monde Diplomatique, Ignacio Ramonet, purveys this line of thinking in his book Géopolitique du Chaos. Fortunately, he says, "the specter of decline lurks over "American neo-hegemony."6 The United States is overstretching; it is destroying itself. America will collapse under the weight of its own debt, and will be unable to manage such intractable problems as race, poverty, and unemployment. It is precisely because it is threatened by decline that the United States is so intent on shoring up its hegemony.
The U.S.-Islamist Alliance <snip>