Power

Carrol Cox cbcox at ilstu.edu
Fri Dec 6 08:59:59 PST 2002


Interesting. What does the word "subjectivity" mean anyhow in this context? This screen is a bit blurry for me, and will probably continue to be until I get new glasses in a couple weeks. That's subjective. Questions without the questioner providing his/her own answer along with the question tick me off royally. That's a subjective reaction on my part which I think I can urge as a necessary social principle, arguing from several different perspectives: history of rhetoric, semantic analysis of the interrogative, empirical studies of the actual social or political results of questions without answers, etc.

I don't know whether any of this has any relevance to the current discussion of subjectivity or not. As far as I can see the best analogy for the modern discovery of subjectivity would be a fanciful hypothetical: Suppose someone announced triumphantly that the respiratory system of humans was one of the most important functions of human life, and proceeded to build a political theory on tha, a political theory aimed at undercutting all political theories grounded in the assumption of the importance of social relations. We breathe. We have subjectivity. So what?

Carrol

Miles Jackson wrote:
>
> On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Catherine Driscoll wrote:
>
> > But, isn't there a significant difference between "individuals"
> > and "subjectivity", insofar as you could avoid individualism, but
> > not "subjectivity".
> >
> > Catherine
>
> It is exactly this insistence on the obdurate reality of "subjectivity"
> that intrigues me. The idea that people have unique subjectivities
> emerged in specific societies at specific points in human history; it
> is not simply human nature to conceptualize "subjectivities". To me,
> it's no coincidence that the insistence on the value and importance
> of subjectivity is most extreme in hypercapitalist societies like
> the U. S. To coin a hyperbolic slogan: capitalism produces
> subjectivities. Like most of the effects of capitalism, there are
> good and bad things about this.
>
> Miles



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list