Bush doesn't exempt Americans
By John J. Lumpkin Associated Press Dec. 4, 2002
WASHINGTON - American citizens working for al-Qaida overseas can legally be targeted and killed by the CIA under President Bush's rules for the war on terrorism, U.S. officials say.
The authority to kill U.S. citizens is granted under a secret finding signed by the president after the Sept. 11 attacks that directs the CIA to covertly attack al-Qaida anywhere in the world. The authority makes no exception for Americans, so permission to strike them is understood rather than specifically described, officials said.
These officials said the authority will be used only when other options are unavailable. Militarylike strikes will take place only when law enforcement and internal security efforts by allied foreign countries fail, the officials said.
Capturing and questioning al-Qaida operatives is preferable, even more so if an operative is a U.S. citizen, the officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity. Any decision to strike an American would be made at the highest levels, perhaps by the president.
U.S. officials say few Americans are working with al-Qaida, but no specific estimates are available.
The CIA has killed one American under this authority, although U.S. officials maintain he wasn't the target.
On Nov. 3, a CIA-operated Predator drone fired a missile that killed a carload of suspected al-Qaida operatives in Yemen. The target of the attack, a Yemeni named Qaed Salim Sinan al-Harethi, was the top al-Qaida operative in that country. Efforts by Yemeni authorities to detain him had previously failed.
But the CIA didn't know a U.S. citizen, Yemeni-American Kamal Derwish, was in the car. He died along with Harethi and four other Yemenis.
The Bush administration said the killing of an American in this fashion was legal.
"I can assure you that no constitutional questions are raised here. There are authorities that the president can give to officials," Condoleezza Rice, Bush's national security adviser, said after the attack. "He's well within the balance of accepted practice and the letter of his constitutional authority."
American authorities have alleged that Derwish was the leader of an al-Qaida cell in suburban Buffalo, N.Y. Officials say most of the members of the cell were arrested and charged with supporting terrorists, but Derwish was not accused of any crime in American courts.
The administration defined Derwish as an enemy combatant, the equivalent of a U.S. citizen who fights alongside the enemy on a battlefield, officials said. Under this legal definition, experts say, his constitutional rights are nullified and he can be killed outright.
Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, supported this policy. "A U.S. citizen terrorist will kill you just like somebody from another country."
The government has done little publicly to justify Derwish's killing. Officials have privately suggested his association with Harethi was reason enough.
Other Americans have been similarly classed since Sept. 11, including Jose Padilla, accused of plotting to use a radioactive "dirty bomb" in the United States, and Yaser Esam Hamdi, who was found fighting alongside the Taliban in Afghanistan. Both are in military custody.
However, a third American, John Walker Lindh, was turned over to the civilian courts after being found serving as a foot soldier with the Taliban. He was sentenced to 20 years in prison after pleading guilty to supplying services to the Taliban and carrying explosives in commission of a felony.
Although officials believe only a small number of U.S. citizens went through Osama bin Laden's camps, Americans have been associated with all levels of al-Qaida.
This includes high-level operative Wadih El Hage, a Lebanese-American who was convicted in connection with the 1998 bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa. A former U.S. Army soldier, Ali Mohamed, worked as a trainer and target scout for bin Laden before he was captured and convicted.
Previously, the government's authority to kill a citizen outside the judicial process has been generally restricted to when the American is directly threatening the lives of other Americans or their allies.
Earlier presidential authorizations of lethal covert action, in Latin America and elsewhere, have also tacitly allowed the killing of Americans fighting on the other side, former senior intelligence officials said.
But the officials knew of no instances where U.S. citizens were targeted.
Experts on the Constitution and the international laws of war said the Bush administration's definitions create problems.
Unlike the enemy in previous wars, al-Qaida members don't wear uniforms or serve in a foreign nation's army. Nor do they take to traditional battlefields, except in Afghanistan. But the Bush administration and al-Qaida together have defined the entire world as a battlefield, meaning the attack on Harethi and Derwish was tantamount to an airstrike in a combat zone.
"That is the most vulnerable aspect of the theory," said Scott Silliman, director of Duke University's Center on Law, Ethics and National Security. "Could you put a Hellfire missile into a car in Washington, D.C., under the same theory? The answer is yes, you could."
Human rights groups were divided on the legality of the attack on Harethi. Amnesty International suggested it was an extrajudicial killing, outlawed by international treaty, while Human Rights Watch officials said they believed it was a legitimate wartime action.
<http://www.arizonarepublic.com/news/articles/1204cia04.html> -- Yoshie
* Calendar of Events in Columbus: <http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/calendar.html> * Anti-War Activist Resources: <http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/activist.html> * Student International Forum: <http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/> * Committee for Justice in Palestine: <http://www.osu.edu/students/CJP/>