Heisenberg's uncertainty finally resolved

[Micheal Ellis]

>
>
>That is certainly my understanding of the matter.  Anyway, while
>the Big Bang cosmology represented a very obvious development
>from the notion of an expanding universe, it is not the only
>possible one.  The Steady State cosmology that was championed
>by the late Fred Hoyle and Herman Bondi, also posited an
>expanding universe, but unlike the Big Bang theory, it held
>that the universe had no beginning and no end.  Instead,
>it was conceived as always existing, forever expanding,
>with a continuous creation of new matter, keeping the
>cosmic density constant over time.  The Big Bang theory
>triumphed over the Steady State theory in the 1960s with
>the discovery of cosmic background radiation,

up to now is this being reconsidered? considering alleged hyper novas
(exploding black holes, whatever) emit the same radiation? gamma ray bursts?
did i misread those potential implications? does this not suggest that potentially
"big bangs" are happening all the time?

~M.E.