Twinkling

Gordon Fitch gcf at panix.com
Sat Feb 9 12:41:43 PST 2002


Nathan Newman wrote:
> > Getting ideas approved? Isn't that what voting is for? Twinkling can be
> > considered an informal straw poll mechanism but it has little process or
> > recognition of minority votes. I wouldn't object to twinkling in the
> > abstract if it wasn't tied to the resistance to basic rules of procedure in
> > voting.

Well, voting is akin to 30-minute sex, you see.

Chuck Munson:
> Twinkling is an informal straw poll mechanism. It's a good way to get
> the mood of the room without having audio disruptions or the need for
> many people to say "me too." On the other hand, there are many folks who
> don't like it, including my comrades in the Anti-Capitalist Convergence.

It certainly seems very exciting, negatively exciting, to the more conservative, which I find rather remarkable and perhaps amenable to an entertaining analysis or even a friendly exchange of epithets. Especially Mark Cooper's 'And, praise Jesus, none of that damn "twinkling" going on -- the infantile and wholly idiotic process now in vogue among American activists whereby they raise their hands and wiggle their fingers to show approval of what's being said in one of their endless, process-laden, mind-deadening meetings.'

Whew! Process-laden! He does work up a sweat, doesn't he?

-- Gordon



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list