I doubt, though, that D. H. Lawrence novels serve to improve hetero sex lives.
From _Women in Love_:
***** `Did you need Gerald?' she asked one evening.
`Yes,' he said.
`Aren't I enough for you?' she asked.
`No,' he said. `You are enough for me, as far as a woman is concerned. You are all women to me. But I wanted a man friend, as eternal as you and I are eternal.'
`Why aren't I enough?' she said. `You are enough for me. I don't want anybody else but you. Why isn't it the same with you?'
`Having you, I can live all my life without anybody else, any other sheer intimacy. But to make it complete, really happy, I wanted eternal union with a man too: another kind of love,' he said.
`I don't believe it,' she said. `It's an obstinacy, a theory, a perversity.'
`Well --' he said.
`You can't have two kinds of love. Why should you!'
It seems as if I can't,' he said. `Yet I wanted it.'
`You can't have it, because it's false, impossible,' she said.
`I don't believe that,' he answered. *****
The end of the novel.
I recommend a vigorous exercise instead. :-> -- Yoshie
* Calendar of Events in Columbus: <http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/calendar.html> * Anti-War Activist Resources: <http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/activist.html> * Student International Forum: <http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/> * Committee for Justice in Palestine: <http://www.osu.edu/students/CJP/>