At 07:18 PM 2/14/02 -0600, Jeffrey Fisher wrote:
>that would be SWEET. shoot, i'd subscribe.
>
>the range of snitcam domains appear to be available.
>
>we might be onto something.
heh. we? We? WE??? if it's a snitcam, then only snit would be on somethin' pal, and then only if the beau wants to make guest appearances.
<pout> other than that, damn it, you have to read my boring old academic papers... i need my ego stroked first! WAAAAAH!
back to your regularly scheduled LOBfest...
kelley
>On Thursday, February 14, 2002, at 07:10 PM, Max B. Sawicky wrote:
>
>>What I can't figure out is why you don't have
>>your own 24-7 Snit-cam. Kids still in the house? -mbs