"Tahir Wood" <twood at uwc.ac.za> wrote:
>I've been following the fascism debate here with interest - it's something that's always interested me, not least because there always seems to be this problem in pinning down exactly what it is. Often what you get is a kind of checklist definition, i.e. if x, y and z are present it's fascism and if one of them is absent then it's not really fascism, but just some form of conservatism or something.
(...)
etc., etc., the rest of Tahir's post