Daniel misrepresented (or misunderstood) _me_, Kelley. Which is why I posted. I snipped because I reacted specifically to his misrepresentation of my example that made use of Wilson. I said: altruism's a technical term made use of by biologists. Example: Wilson. Daniel's comment implied _only_ Wilson used the term and I was engaged in some kind of definitional sleight-of-hand. "You can't claim the terms are 'used' just because Wilson uses them."
In that sense I don't think I misrepresented anything. I've already pointed out I don't go for the logic that says odious personal views imply bad science. So what I cut wasn't germane to the point I wanted to stress.
But as this tit-for-tat bullshit is intellectually profitless and a waste of time, my last words for the list are:
See ya.