From: <cian_oconnor at yahoo.co.uk>
I'm sorry, but how does that meet the falsifiable test? How can one test Marx's theories? Where is the experiment?
%%%%%
CB: You test Marx's theory by examining real events and using abstraction. Experiment is not as readily available in social SCIENCE.
In a Preface to _Capital_ , Marx's says that in economics abstraction must replace certain types of experiments.
"Every beginning is difficult, holds in all sciences. To understand the first chapter, especially the section that contains the analysis of commodities, will, therefore, present the greatest difficulty. That which concerns more especially the analysis of the substance of value and the magnitude of value, I have, as much as it was possible, popularised. [1] The value-form, whose fully developed shape is the money-form, is very elementary and simple. Nevertheless, the human mind has for more than 2,000 years sought in vain to get to the bottom of it all, whilst on the other hand, to the successful analysis of much more composite and complex forms, there has been at least an approximation. Why? Because the body, as an organic whole, is more easy of study than are the cells of that body. In the analysis of economic forms, moreover, neither microscopes nor chemical reagents are of use. The force of abstraction must replace both. But in bourgeois society, the commodity-form of the p! roduct of labour ― or value-form of the commodity ― is the economic cell-form. To the superficial observer, the analysis of these forms seems to turn upon minutiae. It does in fact deal with minutiae, but they are of the same order as those dealt with in microscopic anatomy. "