Science, Science & Marxism

[Mark McEahern]

Justin Schwartz wrote:
> The idea that we accept what science says about its subject
> matter as true does not make scientists into priests whose
> views cannot be questioned.  Their competence is limited to
> their subject matters.

Ideally, there would not be a distinct 'we' who listens to what a
separate-from-us 'science' says.  In other words, we don't [simply] accept
what science says about its subject matter--nor do we wily nily reject it.
We accept it as provisional and as always open to refutation.

Always?

Yes, always.

Cheers,

// mark