Who Does No Work, Shall Not Eat

[Chuck0]

Gordon Fitch wrote:
> 
> Justin Schwartz:
> > Well,I'm a hedonist, and no puritan. But the points are pretty simple. It's
> > politically necessary because working people will resent supporting those
> > whom they consider shirkers and parasites, and that will undermine the
> > solidarity necessary for a socialist project. It'[s morally right because
> > no one has a right to live off the labor of others without contributing
> > something in return. The Bolsies reappropraited the slogan, Who does no
> > work, will not eat. Leaving aside those who can't wprk, what's wrong with
> > that?
> 
> It ensures permanent domination by a minority.

I'm all for getting rid of freeloaders, shirkers and parasites.

Abolish the rich now!

<< Chuck0 >>

Infoshop.org             -> http://www.infoshop.org/
Alternative Press Review -> http://www.altpr.org/
Practical Anarchy Online -> http://www.practicalanarchy.org/
Anarchy: AJODA           -> http://www.anarchymag.org/
MutualAid.org            -> http://www.mutualaid.org/
Factsheet 5              -> http://www.factsheet5.org/
AIM: AgentHelloKitty

Web publishing and services for your nonprofit:
Bread and Roses Web Publishing
http://www.breadandrosesweb.org/

INTERNATIONALISM IN PRACTICE

An American soldier in a hospital explained how he was wounded: He said,
"I was told that the way to tell a hostile Vietnamese from a friendly
Vietnamese was to shout ‘To hell with Ho Chi Minh!’ If he shoots, he’s
unfriendly. So I saw this dude and yelled ‘To hell with Ho Chi Minh!’
and he yelled back, ‘To hell with President Johnson!’ We were shaking
hands when a truck hit us." 

(from 1,001 Ways to Beat the Draft, by Tuli Kupferburg).