then why don't you quit invoking anarchist to legitimate what you say. just say you're Joe R. Golowka and this is what you think. if anarchists have nothing in common then it's useless to call yourself an anarchist in these discussions, especially if you're going to label everyone else as NOT an anarchist and judge them as condescendingly as you do. chuck0's discourse is a great example: if you're not sympatico with what he believes, then you ultimately support either the capitalist state or the socialist state. and then when you don't have an answer as to how to address the questions raise, he pulls a chaz and says it all happen automagically when people decide.
horse hockey.