criticism of Keynes quotation/criteria for change
A.J. Peticolas
petico at io.com
Thu Jan 24 07:18:04 PST 2002
> "Burke ever held, and held rightly, that it can seldom be right to
> sacrifice a present benefit for a doubtful advantage in the future.
> It is not wise to look too far ahead; our powers of prediction are
> slight, our command over results infinitesimal. It is therefore the
> happiness of our own contemporaries that is our main concern; we
> should be very chary of sacrificing large numbers of people for the
> sake of a contingent end, however advantageous that may appear. We
> can never know enough to make the chance worth taking. There is this
> further consideration that is often in need of emphasis: it is not
> sufficient that the state of affairs which we seek to promote should
> be better than the state of affairs which preceded it; it must be
> sufficiently better to make up for the evils of the transition."
>
> - --John Maynard Keynes
>
> The very logic that keeps too many people in poverty and lots of others
> locked up for sticking
> chemicals in their bodies that authoritarians don't approve
> of...................
Loved the Keynes quote, and the criticism is nonsense.
Changing drug laws clearly meets the Keynes test if one
looks at pros and cons.
Another test I like is the "happiness is a better
set of problems" test. There can be real problems with
any change; are the new problems better than the set
of problems we've got now?
Regards,
Anne Peticolas
Austin, Texas
More information about the lbo-talk
mailing list