cian> Well from conversations with people I know who have worked for
cian> the big three, they probably knew about the hole, but ignored
cian> it because of lucrative consultancy fees.
For what it's worth, that Enron fees to Andersen were a *very, very* small part of total revenues.
Not remotely enough to justify *any* risk on the part of those not *directly* involved.
And given the way Andersen is organized and run, it seems likely that almost no other partners knew what was going on in the Enron account (or "engagement" as they call them now), which is of course how Andersen is spinning the whole thing.
Best, Kendall Clark