lbo-talk-digest V1 #5603

Chris Doss chrisd at russiajournal.com
Sat Jan 26 06:27:21 PST 2002


Moreover, you don't need to point to psychological makeup to account for the behavior of the asset-strippers and whatnot in Russia in the 1990s. Hayek will do just fine for that -- in the absence of a functioning legal system and with no way to produce goods that would be marketable on a world scale, the best way to maximize profits is obviously to steal. They were behaving like perfectly "rational" economic agents.

Chris Doss The Russia Journal ------------------

The passage contains the following ideas. Adult personality traits are rooted in the family relations characteristic of infancy and childhood. Paranoia, hostility, sadistic aggressiveness etc. are the product of a particular kind of family relations. (These two ideas are elaborated in Melanie Klein's "object relations" theory of the roots of adult personality in experiences in infancy and childhood.) Gorky's My Childhood describes family relations like those Klein claims are associated with the dominance in adult personality of relatively primitive forms of defence against persecutory and depressive anxiety such as paranoia, sadistic aggressiveness, etc. To the extent they were typical of Russian peasant households the relations described by Gorky would lead to those traits as typical of personalities emerging from those households - they might show up, for instance, as extreme anti-Semitism. This would have social implications.

It's the opposite of racist. It doesn't trace personality traits to unalterable innate "genetic" features of individuals. It explains racism as the product of primitive defences against anxiety, defences themselves taken as most likely dominant in personality because of relations in infancy and childhood. It does, however, acknowledge the existence of irrationality in the form of racism, other kinds of paranoia, sadism etc. It doesn't assume that individuals are everywhere and always rational.

It's been used (by Roger Money-Kyrle in Psychoanalysis and Politics) to explain the roots in family and economic relations of the kind of personality strongly attracted to fascism and Hitler in Germany. As I pointed out some time ago, the general ontological idea I was using it to illustrate, "internal social relations," is implicitly used by Marx to tie the coming into political dominance in mid-19th century France of the mentality represented by Louis Bonaparte to the irrational mentality of a large section of the French peasantry.

I assume when you say "offensive," you mean, among other things, obviously mistaken. In what way are these ideas obviously mistaken.

Ted



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list