Communism

Joe R. Golowka joeG at ieee.org
Tue Jul 2 13:27:13 PDT 2002



> That's the argument for market socialism. Order Schweickart's Against
> Capitslim (westview), and get back to me. For therest, your ideas strike me
> as hopelessly naive. Gripped as I am in the first of bourgeois ideology, I
> don't believe that a society could work the way you decribe; I think it's a
> pipe dream.

Did you know that there have been societies which have worked similar to the way he described? Not completely the same, but with similar basics - no state, no money, distribution by need, directly democratic planning, etc.


> I wouldn't fight for it, and I don't think many working people
> would.

Many working people have. The ultimate aim of the Spanish Revolution was libertarian communism - which is a close cousing of what he's advocating.


> In fact, I'd fight _against_ it; I think it would be far worse than
> what we have now. And I'm a socialist: if you can't persuade me, your
> arguments will be lost on a skeptic.

This is a perfect example of what the concept of a coordinator class can help explain. You and most other members of the coordinator class would not support such a thing since it goes against your class interests. Market Socialism and centralized planning are both basically coordinator class visions of socialism.

-- Joe R. Golowka JoeG at ieee.org Anarchist FAQ - http://www.anarchyfaq.org

"If the Nuremberg laws were applied today, then every Post-War American president would have to be hanged." - Noam Chomsky



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list