analytical philosophy. It's more like highly charged, rather poetic (at its best) expression of feeling than careful construction of arguments. That's not a criticism, just a statement. I recognize that the Russian philosophers
were not trying to be Hume or Mill and failing. They were doing something else. When I went to philosophy conferences in Russia, this lead to culture conflicts.
----------
Me:
They never had a Kant but they had a lot of Pascals.
Chris Doss The Russia Journal