"Peter K." wrote:
>
> >Willy Greenfields wrote:
> >
> >>The Nation has its wealthy patrons and is itself
>[clip]
>
> There's In These Times, the infrequent yet hearty Baffler, and
> The Progressive.
> Ehrenreich's latest column:
> http://www.progressive.org/August%202002/ehr0802.html
>
> Harpers (http://www.harpers.org/) has a cover story on capitalism's
> shortcomings, but hasn't updated their website. There's the Guardian
> and Observer also.
>
Who reads these various publications? What is their motive for reading them? How do these publications _change_ the political activity of their readers?
Would the answers to these questions be any different if the publications in question were even better written? If they were worse written?
Carrol