I am not talking about aesthetics. I am talking about infrastructural problems without adequate resources to handle them. Care must be taken not to overwhelm existing ag. societies.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 11:41:31AM -0400, Doug Henwood wrote:
> Michael Perelman wrote:
>
> >I was merely pointing out the ag. trade deficit. The US excels in
> >producing large amounts of grain per capita because grain production is
> >easiest to mechanize.
>
> And wouldn't that be good for the starving masses in poor countries?
> What's wrong with mechanizing agriculture to feed hundreds of
> millions of people? I can't shake the suspicion that you have some
> aesthetic objection.
>
> Doug
-- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu