mbs: so what?
priority for the ISO, at least on campus before Seattle. I also recalle reading several accounts of a rather contentious national conference of that movement where there was a split between the folks who wanted a hierarchical national organization and those who wanted a network.
mbs: so what?
The ISO involvement in the student anti-war movement in late 2001 blew up in their faces when student activists discovered that the ISO had organized a bunch of regional conferences and has placed several of their members in position to lead and/or facilitate these regional gatherings.
mbs: so what?
I'm sure that student activists can fill you in on the rest of the details. That's the little bit I know. << Chuck0 >>
mbs: the thrust of your comments was against the ISO for just being there. The real question that would merit criticism (or not) would be what they actually did.