US beats Mexico in World Cup

Jim Westrich westrich at miser.umass.edu
Tue Jun 18 11:26:18 PDT 2002


The Mexican players are paid better and more likely candidates for prima donnas than the US side. Mexico had three top division European players and the US had 1 I believe (Reyna and Friedel plays 1st division Brit football right?). Mexican players are generally in the Mexican pro league (Futbol Mexicano) which pays higher salaries the MLS in the US.

The most heartening thing about this World Cup has been the amazing amount of effort displayed by lower paid sides in out hustling their pampered foes (i.e., the success of S. Korea, Senegal, Turkey, Denmark, and the U. S. against the flame-outs of France, Argentina, Portugal, Italy). Ireland (without their most pampered player Roy Keane) nearly beat the more lavishly paid Spain. There has been plenty of individual fireworks on display but it could not be clearer that this World Cup has proven that soccer is a TEAM game.

Jim

At 12:58 PM 6/18/02 -0400, you wrote:
>I must admit the modesty of the US team at least
>makes them leaps less annoying than America's Home Team, I wish the
>Mexican team coulda made a better exit.

People walk around everyday Playin' games and takin' scores Tryin' to make other people lose their mind Well, be careful you don't lose yours

--Aretha Franklin



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list