> Yes. Only a nutboy would say "primarily for cynical great power
> reasons." And only another nutboy would think this NYT article
> demonstrates that the U.S. supported Bosnian Muslims "primarily for
> cynical great power reasons."
>
> Why are you trying so hard to reduce your credibility to the level of
> Reed Irvine?
Your ad hominems are radiant, but you've just watered down your argument by half.
The NYT piece quotes senior Bush officials who were present at the moment of policy conception saying - in their own words - that the tilt towards the Muslims was born of two concerns: (1) humanitarian and (2) power politics. You choose to accept the officials' claim that (1) predominated, while Chomsky thinks it was (2). You've balanced your teetering "expose" of Chomsky on a rather thin stilt.
Seth