The "anarchist analysis" of "a coordinator class" as you explain it (though I'm not sure if the analysis in question has ever been prevalent among anarchists), in my opinion, serves the interest of those who want to exclude as many workers as possible from union representation.
***** Final Internationally - Recognised Core Labour Standards in the United States
REPORT FOR THE WTO GENERAL COUNCIL REVIEW OF THE TRADE POLICIES OF THE UNITED STATES
(Geneva, 12 and 14 September 2001)
...National labour legislation does not cover agricultural, domestic workers and certain kinds of supervisory workers. Moreover, the concept of "employee" as used in the law does not accord protection to "independent contractors" even where they have no separate economic identity independent of a particular employer.... In the area of freedom of association, the US should ratify ILO Conventions No. 87 and No. 98 and bring its law and practice into line with their very basic provisions providing individual workers with a right to form and join a trade union and for that union to have the ability to undertake collective representation of their interests. National labour legislation needs to be extended to cover all workers in the economy including agricultural workers, domestic workers, migrant workers and supervisory workers.
<http://www.union-network.org/uniindep.nsf/53d0d8029c2826f5c125682c0048c3c1/3ba027cf9ff65b13c1256ac7004a1d60?OpenDocument> ***** -- Yoshie
* Calendar of Events in Columbus: <http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/calendar.html> * Anti-War Activist Resources: <http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/activist.html> * Student International Forum: <http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/> * Committee for Justice in Palestine: <http://www.osu.edu/students/CJP/>