People get stuck on particulars. Some particulars can be pretty important. Clinton/Gore's greatest advantage over Bush, relatively speaking, I would say is in the area of regulation. In some areas they are clearly worse. I won't rehash any net scoring, since I've addressed that before. The issue isn't better, worse, or different. It's how much better, in light of opportunities.
mbs
>
>
>I'm confused, I thought there was supposed to be a lot more than a
>dime's difference between Gore and Bush...