Regressions and Advances (Was: Re: Walzer on the Left)

Kendall Clark kendall at monkeyfist.com
Fri Mar 15 12:57:25 PST 2002



>>>>> "miles" == Miles Jackson <cqmv at pdx.edu> writes:

miles> Fortunately, there's actual scientific research on this.

miles> Various researchers have conducted experiments that randomly

miles> assign men to different types of film and measure attitudes

miles> and behavior towards women. The basic finding is this:

miles> exposure to "aggressive" erotic materials provoke more

miles> negative attitudes and more aggression against women.

miles> Exposure to sexually explicit films with no aggressive

miles> content does not provoke more negative attitudes and

miles> aggression against women, compared to groups exposed to films

miles> without sexual content.

Research MacKinnon and Dworkin cite repeatedly. Thanks for putting it clearly.

miles> So does any porn provoke violence against women? It's not as

miles> simple as the Dworkinites assume.

I don't know what a Dworkinite is, but M&D certainly present a nuanced, careful view in *In Harm's Way* and Dworkin does so alone in many places. They claim porn causes or contributes to a fairly wide range of social ills, from the objectification of women, to the undue focus on sex as penile-vaginal intercourse, to diminishment of some men's willingess to credit testimony of rape survivors, to apathy about sexual violence in general, to the actual commission of rape and sexual violence.

Seems neither assumptive nor simplistic.

Best, Kendall Clark -- If you've gotta blacklist, I wanna be on it. -- Billy Bragg



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list