|| -----Original Message-----
|| From: Steve Perry
||
|| to take just one of your points: if you suppose the pentagon
|| was 'hardened'
|| in a particular spot to withstand attack, then what are the odds that a
|| hijacked jetliner flown by someone who is still basically an
|| amateur pilot
|| will be able to strike exactly that spot on purpose? trained
|| fighter pilots
|| probably couldn't do it in battle conditions more than 4 out of
|| 5. and guys
|| like this, i'm guessing, 1 or 2 out of 5.
You seem to have trouble concentrating,let me help you. Pay attention:
1 - I don't "suppose" anything. I didn't say "I'm guessing, 1 out of 5 wedges was reinforced". I said Wedge One was, period. I've posted at length on this with ample sources. http://www.architectureweek.com/2001/1003/news_1-2.html Pentagon Battered but Firm So resilient was the newly strengthened section of the {Pentagon} that a glass display case only 40 feet (12 meters) from where the plane entered the building survived without a crack. (...)
2 - The amateur pilot couldn't have been pilot then, could he?
Are you a combat pilot? You must be an authority as you don't cite any sources. None of the aviation sources I've read were able to narrow down the flying skill needed for the Pentagon approach down to 10 percentage points like you have, so you gotta be a top jock.
Hakki