If you can't see that you have an attitude problem that foments the posting by you of nasty attacks on me, what is the point of me trying to point it out? It only provokes you. But at some point I would like to see Doug start to lean more on people to tone down the personal attacks. He has already posted one request, which you clearly have ignored. As I said to Pradeep, I sometimes step over the line, but then I apologize. What about you?
Let's reduce the level of nastiness on the list.
-Chip
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
> [mailto:owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com]On Behalf Of Charles Jannuzi
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:18 AM
> To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
> Subject: RE: Russian Israelis
>
>
> >"Chip Berlet" <cberlet at igc.org>
> >Subject: RE: Russian Israelis
> >Hi Pradeep!
>
> Hey, Chipster, since you posted this to the whole list, I
> thought I'd give
> my response to it. I know you always learn a lot from reading
> my posts, so
> here goes.
>
> >I suspect most people on this list find this >exchange pointless
>
> Yes, one of the endless permutations of pointlessness that is your
> speciality.
>
> >Your relentless lack of civility and aggressive >attack mode
> creates a kind
> of
> >snearing arrogance that is hard to tolerate. I >do not wish
> to engage you
> in
> >a debate where the response will most likely >be more crude priapic
> bashing.
>
> Well, actually it's far easier to follow that mode than the
> insinuation and
> defamation that others do. The only people who wouldn't know
> why he was
> angry would be the list voyeur type who only noticed once he got mad.
> Happens all the time on lists like this.
>
> >I sometimes lose my temper on this list, and >then I
> apologize. If you have
> >an off switch--click it. Let me try one more >time.
>
> Something is definitely switched off at your end, but it sure
> isn't the send
> button.
>
> >Many people disagree with me, and that's OK. >Many of the
> people on this
> list
> >with whom I disagree, still engage in a >productive
> exchange, and I have
> >learned a lot from them.
>
> In my experiences, as source of disagreement mind you, such
> exchanges with
> you are the cerebral equivalent of a bowel impaction.
>
> >My assessment of your bigotry is based on >the same model we
> all use at the
> >think tank where I work. We study the >history and structure of
> oppressions
> >based on race, gender, sexuality, and class >as well as religion and
> >ethnicity.
>
> Just who pays for your think tank anyway?
>
> (something like military intelligence in ongoing self-contradictions
> apparently)
>
> I ask to make sure it never ever gets a penny of my money if
> I can help it.
>
> >Pradeep, you step over the line. It is a mild >form of
> antisemitism. I am
> not
> >trying to smear you.
>
> Yes, some might even mistake having nothing to say whatsoever
> as subtlety.
>
> Charles Jannuzi
>
>
>
>
>
>