This, of course, does not explain why the Feds do not complain but again they are just doling out part of the money and no administration. They do not like to be cheated by the states and raise a stink when certain funding streams get out of wack (hospital share stuff and uncompensated care pools) but have left a lot alone.
There is also the argument that Medicaid essentially subsidizes all people's health care. That is, to the extent that Medicaid actually pays for care received by the poor (instead of given away for free) then that reduces the need to share the costs of people who cannot pay. I do think some people intuit this in their support of Medicaid.
Jim
Max Sawicky wrote:
>Another possibility is they hate programs that
>provide money to able-bodied people who don't work.
>The EITC is means-tested, in its own way, and the
>only ones who hate it are some extreme-right Repugs.
>Senator Boren, about as far to the right as you can
>get for a Democrat, once proposed a new WPA.
>The public doesn't seem to hate means-tested
>Medicaid. (Food stamps, maybe.) Against all
>apparent odds, it has been
>growing like Topsy for 15 years. --mbs
So Topsy isn't the stunted one. I guess it's just Flopsy and Mopsy that are stunted.
"For I'm not bound and I never will be to a wrinkled crinkled wadded dollar bill."
-Mac Wiseman