FT: Anti-globalisation alliance lies low

[Peter K.]

>Illusions as to the usefulness of this are one of the strongest negative
>features of the anti-g movement. If that movement is to continue to be a
>positive it must destroy this illusion.
>
>It is a small boy's dream rather than serious politics.
>
>Carrol

Again with the insults. Seems rather adolescent. At least you admit the
movement is a positive. Even though I think that campaign finance
reform was useful and not an illusion to be destroyed, I do agree with
you that the Democrats are the running dogs of the ruling class which
is why I supported Nader. The Democrats (including Rodham Clinton and Lieberman)

 who want to make the work requirements for welfare stricter are fighting
on the wrong side of the class war and this during a time when the
economy is floundering.

Peter