Welfare State
kelley at pulpculture.org
kelley at pulpculture.org
Sat May 11 12:38:40 PDT 2002
At 03:23 PM 5/11/02 -0400, Doug Henwood wrote:
>Nathan Newman wrote:
>
>>But out of a $2 trillion federal
>>budget, and about another trillion dollars at the state and local level, the
>>money goes overwhelmingly to poor and working class folks.
>
>Overwhelmingly? Could you be a bit more specific? The U.S. welfare state,
>such as it is, does very little to reduce poverty - i.e., compared to
>other countries, it barely adjusts market income distributions. Thanks to
>the mortgage interest tax deduction, the bulk of federal housing subsidies
>go to upper income households - over 75% of benefits go to the top two
>income quintiles <http://www.nlihc.org/pubs/cpgraph5.htm>. Social Security
>is mildly redistributive, which is a blessing, but it's under constant
>attack, and I underline "mildly." Military, cop, and prison spending can
>be said to benefit working class soldiers, cops, and wardens, but that's
>probably not what you have in mind, is it? So just what are you talking about?
>
>Doug
oh, i don't know, if we took some position on this list certainly, Nathan
could just maintain that it all goes to the working class, since making
distinctions between poor, working, middle, and upper middle class is
needlessly pitting strata against one another!
<snort>
kelley
More information about the lbo-talk
mailing list