Tue., May 14: Protest Ashcroft!

Michael Pugliese debsian at pacbell.net
Sat May 11 18:29:47 PDT 2002


Dennis Perrin>...this "concern" for Constitutional rights coming from a Leninist is a bit rich. I mean, how does one who reveres the now-stuffed autocrat...

The Wilson Quarterly ... right-wing Republicans, handed the Stalinists a useful means of rallying support in the liberal and civil liberties communities. Unlike America's real radicals http://wwics.si.edu/OUTREACH/WQ/WQSELECT/LIPSET.HTM

Magazine: TELOS, SUMMER 1998

MODERNITY AND TOTALITARIANISM, L. Pellacani ...> Contrary to the legend spread by the Marxist- Leninist Left after the

XXth Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.(n62) Stalinism was not a degeneration of Leninism or a system extraneous to the communist tradition. Rather, it was the logical outcome of Lenin's program. In Lenin's writings, the revolution in power has the task of "clean Russian soil of any damaging insects -- fleas, scoundrels,bedbugs, the rich, etc."(n63) Russia is a "moral morass"(n64) that must be disinfected by resorting to "systematic violence against the bourgeoise and its accomplices."(n65) This is a merciless operation, but one absolutely necessary it the "greed, the sordid, hateful, frantic greed of the money bags"(n66) is to be uprooted. At any rate, what rights have filthy "parasites,"(n67) who live like "vampires"(n68) feeding on the workers' blood? To eliminate them is a moral duty.

Lenin's chilling "moral legacy" is consistent with all this. In 1922, he

wrote to Stalin: "we will purify Russia for a long time."(n69) In the

same year, he sent Kutsky the following brutally frank instructions: "To

highlight a thesis of principle, correct on the political level (and not

just in a strictly juridical sense), motivating the essence and

justification of terror, its necessity and its limits. The tribunal must

not eliminate terror; to promise that would mean deluding oneself and

others; it must be justified and legitimated on the level of principles,

clearly, without falsity and without embellishments. The formulation

must be as wide as possible, since only revolutionary justice and

revolutionary consciousness will decide the conditions of its more or

less long application."(n70)

According to Lenin, having achieved the "bloody extermination of the

rich,"(n71) the Bolshevik Party had to institutionalize a permanent

civil war. The declared objective was the "implacable annihilation(n72)

of the petty bourgeoisie and the land-owning peasants. Here Lenin's

prose is brutally frank once again. Immediately after adopting the NEP to avoid the total collapse of production, he wrote: "The enemy is no longer a horde of white guards at the command of the big landowners, supported by all the Mensheviks, the Social Revolutionaries and the international bourgeoisie. The enemy today is the daily economic reality of a country of small peasants, a country in which big industry is in ruins. The enemy today is the petty bourgeois element that surrounds us like the air and penetrates deeply into the files of the proletariat."(n73) Thus the "final struggle" -- an expression that in the Bolshevik lingo had the same meaning as the "final solution" for the Nazis -- had to be unleashed against small entrepreneurs who grow into large entrepreneurs and thus become potential regenerators of capitalism. This was because Lenin was convinced that "small industry incessantly generated capitalism and the bourgeoisie, every day, every hour, spontaneously and on a mass scale."(n74) Hence, his declaration of war against the small entrepreneur: "The Kulak is a ferocious enemy of Soviet power. Either the Kulaks will exterminate an infinite number of workers, or the workers will implacably crush the Kulaks' revolts. There cannot be a middle road .... The struggle against the Kulaks is the decisive and final struggle .... The Kulaks are the most ferocious, brutal, savage exploiters .... These poisonous spiders have fattened up at the expense of the peasants ruined by the war, at the expense of starving workers. These bloodsuckers have drunk the blood of the peasants, getting richer as workers suffered from hunger in the cities and in the factories. These vampires have grabbed and continue to grab the land ... and enslave poor peasants once again. Implacable war against these Kulaks. To the death! Hate and loathing towards the parties that defend them: right-wing Social Revolutionaries, Mensheviks and the present left-wing social- revolutionaries. The workers must put down the revolts of the Kulaks with an iron hand."(n75)

A terrorist state, the communist state is also permanently mobilized

both on the internal as well as the external front: internally, in order

to eradicate what Bucharin used to call the "spontaneity of the

capillarily-diffused petty bourgeois," but also externally, since the

final aim of the palingenic revolution cannot deviate from the "global

dictatorship of the proletariat."(n76) Otherwise, the omnipresent and

omnipervasive bourgeois spirit would return to infect those men

tirelessly regenerated by the "party of the pures." In short, the

peculiar nature of the communist project -- to "clean up the spectral

old world"(n77) on the basis of the Satanic principle that "everything

that exists must perish"(n78) -- requires that the "new society" be

organized as a "fortress under siege" and that in it everything be

organized along military lines.(n79) Furthermore, it requires the

annihilation of all external powers that, by their mere presence,

prevent the "reconstruction of the world"(n80) through the reshaping of "human material created by bloody and filthy capitalism."(n81)



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list