Con Games (was: the curriculum of the "intifada")

kelley at pulpculture.org kelley at pulpculture.org
Sun May 12 11:45:02 PDT 2002


does the WSJ have no standards at all? The quote, below, is from Frontpage magazine, posted on May 9 <http://letters.frontpagemag.com/cgi-bin/inyourface.pl?article=3263> . However, the Berk catalog shows a course description that does not include the last line. Has the WSJ been called on this at all? Can it be?

I see that you can no longer find the course at the Berkeley site. (the information that I archived, below)

From the Wall Street Journal online. Once again, the academic left shows it's true colors. Hint: true diversity of opinion is not among them: ********************************************* The Intifada Curriculum At UC Berkeley, conservatives need not apply.

BY ROGER KIMBALL Saturday, May 11, 2002 12:01 a.m. EDT

Are the regents of the University of California asleep?

This past winter, the Daily Californian, a student newspaper at Berkeley, reported on a women's studies course that involved such educational activities as writing papers about sexual fantasies, visiting strip clubs, and watching an instructor have sex. All of which earned students units toward graduation at UC Berkeley.

After the national press picked up the story, embarrassed university administrators shut down that particular exercise in transgression.

Have they learned their lesson? Dream on. Consider this item from the Berkeley English department's fall course catalog. It is for English R1A, "The Politics and Poetics of Palestinian Resistance," which will earn students four units toward their degree. The description is worth an extensive quote:

"The brutal Israeli military occupation of Palestine, [ongoing] since 1948, has systematically displaced, killed, and maimed millions of Palestinian people. And yet, from under the brutal weight of the occupation, Palestinians have produced their own culture and poetry of resistance. This class will examine the history of the [resistance] and the way that it is narrated by Palestinians in order to produce an understanding of the Intifada. . . . This class takes as its starting point the right of Palestinians to fight for their own self-determination. Conservative thinkers are encouraged to seek other sections."

Let's leave aside the gross tendentiousness of this little bijou. Let's leave aside, too, the question of what a class on Mideast politics is doing under the rubric of English. The real question is what such agitprop is doing on the curriculum. "The Politics and Poetics of Palestinian Resistance" is not an academic or scholarly inquiry. It will not attempt to step back and assess the merits of arguments for and against a certain interpretation of historical events. On the contrary, "conservative thinkers are encouraged to seek other sections." Diversity? Phooey.

Universities used to be dedicated to the advancement of knowledge. It was understood that if they were to be successful, they had to presuppose what Matthew Arnold called the ideal of "disinterestedness." In describing criticism as "disinterested," Arnold did not mean that it speaks without reference to a particular point of view. Rather, he meant a habit of inquiry that refused to lend itself to any "ulterior, political, practical considerations about ideas."

We might say that Arnold looked to criticism to provide a bulwark against ideology, something that John Searle, a very different sort of Berkeley professor, put with his customary lucidity: "The idea that the curriculum should be converted to any partisan purposes is a perversion of the ideal of the university."

Since the 1960s, however, universities have become havens for displaced radicals and the humanities instruments of political agitation. Arnold's vision of the civilizing potential of "the best that has been thought and said" gives way to a smorgasbord of attacks on Western civilization that are a part of the "multicultural" agenda.

It may be tempting to dismiss what goes on at Berkeley as nothing more than the twittering of academics--a group, after all, that is notorious for being out of touch with reality. The problem is that the fate of academic life is not only an academic issue. It is an issue that touches deeply on one of the chief crucibles of the future.

When UC Berkeley allows classes like "The Politics and Poetics of Palestinian Resistance" to be conducted under its aegis, it betrays a public trust in several ways. For one thing, because Berkeley is widely regarded as a premier educational institution, what it does will be emulated elsewhere. Therefore, condoning courses that are merely fronts for political activism abets the degradation of the humanities.

In allowing classes in which conservatives are unwelcome, Berkeley provides further evidence that universities are beholden to leftist ideology. Universities loudly promulgate a rhetoric of diversity, yet practice strict intellectual conformity on all contentious issues.

Finally, by allowing such courses, Berkeley further erodes the line that once separated academic life from the hurly-burly world of political affairs. The integrity of that line has earned universities a special status as places apart in our society--and tax-exempt because their inquiry was not merely partisan.

In the late 1800s, the German aphorist G.C. Lichtenberg noted that "Nowadays we everywhere seek to propagate wisdom: who knows whether in a couple of centuries there may not exist universities for restoring the old ignorance?" Now we know.

Mr. Kimball is editor of The New Criterion. ******************************************************** Kevin KSmant at iusb.edu

-------

The Politics and Poetics of Palestinian Resistance

Course Number: English R1A LEC 4 Units

Semester and Year: fall 2002

Location and Time: 204 Wheeler TuTh 2:00-3:30

Instructor: Shingavi, Snehal

Instructor Email: sshingav at uclink4.berkeley.edu

Course Control Number: 28448

Final Exam Number: TBA

Booklist: (tentative) Men in the Sun and Other Palestinian Stories, Ghassan Kanafani; The Homeland (Arab Women Writers), Hamidah Nana; Born Palestinian, Born Black, Suheir Hammad; Drops of This Story, Suheir Hammad; Enemy of the sun, Naseer Hasan Aruri; The Adam of Two Edens : Selected Poems, Mahmud Darwish; Memory for Forgetfulness : August, Beirut, 1982, Mahmud Darwish; Victims of a Map : A Bilingual Anthology of Arabic Poetry, Mahmud Darwish; Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict, Norman G. Finkelstein; The Question of Palestine, Edward W. Said; Blaming the Victims: Spurious Scholarship and the Palestinian Question, Edward W. Said; The Politics of Dispossession: The Struggle for Palestinian Self-Determination, 1969-1994, Edward W. Said; Intifada, Phil Marshall

Course Description: Since the inception of the Intifada in September of 2000, Palestinians have been fighting for their right to exist. The

brutal Israeli military occupation of Palestine, an occupation that has been ongoing since 1948, has systematically displaced, killed, and maimed millions of Palestinian people. And yet, from under the brutal weight of the occupation, Palestinians have produced their own culture and poetry of resistance. This class will examine the history of the Palestinian resistance and the way that it is narrated by Palestinians in order to produce an understanding of the Intifada and to develop a coherent political analysis of the situation. This class takes as its starting point the right of Palestinians to fight for their own self-determination.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list