violence: two opposing views

Carrol Cox cbcox at ilstu.edu
Tue May 14 18:50:18 PDT 2002


Who is saying what in this post? I find it unintelligible because of the cacaphony of voices, none of them labelled.

Carrol


> Seth Ackerman wrote:
>
> On Palestine:
>
> "More disturbing is the idea that in this day and age there are still
> people stupid enough to call the argument that "violence is bad on
> both sides" "stupid and bankrupt". For which side do you think that
> violence is good? And why?"
>
> ---
>
> On Korea:
>
> >I'm not going to give a big defense of Truman's foreign policy given
> the
> >bloodiness of the Korean War...
>
> Why not? You think it would have been better to have avoided the
> casualties of the war and had an entire peninsula--rather than half
> of it--at the tender mercies of the Great Leader?
>
>
>
>
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list