That was my point. Liza didn't shy away from criticizing ANSWER in her articles and provided some context. I wouldn't be surprised if Liza got a few emails from ANSWER/IAC supporters accusing her of red-baiting. In the eyes of the authoritarian Left and their supporters, intra-movement criticism is a verboten topic.
If other "movement writers" and left columnists included level-headed criticism of groups in the movement in their coverage, we wouldn't be in this situation. Why should Susan Sarandon or some anti-war activist in Ohio have to find out about ANSWER being a front group for the WWP from watching the O'Reilly Show?
I'd like to know what David Corn thought he was accomplishing by appearing on that show.
Chuck0
------------------------------------------------------------ Personal homepage -> http://chuck.mahost.org/ Infoshop.org -> http://www.infoshop.org/ MutualAid.org -> http://www.mutualaid.org/ Alternative Press Review -> http://www.altpr.org/ Practical Anarchy Online -> http://www.practicalanarchy.org/ Anarchy: AJODA -> http://www.anarchymag.org/
AIM: AgentHelloKitty
Web publishing and services for your nonprofit: Bread and Roses Web Publishing http://www.breadandrosesweb.org/
"...ironically, perhaps, the best organised dissenters in the world today are anarchists, who are busily undermining capitalism while the rest of the left is still trying to form committees."
-- Jeremy Hardy, The Guardian (UK)