> That said, one of the things that WW/IAC/ANSWER have done well is to
> create the coverage of an _upcoming_ event even in such corporate media
> outlets as the _Washington Post_ -- for instance, they got the following
> (largely favorable) 1127-word article about the Oct., 26, 2002 protest
> _before_ it happened.
The problem with the WWP/IAC/ANSWER is that they step on alot of activist toes in their undemocratic rush to hog the media spotlight before major protests. We've seen them do this time and time again in Washington, which is why most local activists hate their fucking guts.
Chuck0
------------------------------------------------------------ Personal homepage -> http://chuck.mahost.org/ Infoshop.org -> http://www.infoshop.org/ MutualAid.org -> http://www.mutualaid.org/ Alternative Press Review -> http://www.altpr.org/ Practical Anarchy Online -> http://www.practicalanarchy.org/ Anarchy: AJODA -> http://www.anarchymag.org/
AIM: AgentHelloKitty
Web publishing and services for your nonprofit: Bread and Roses Web Publishing http://www.breadandrosesweb.org/
"...ironically, perhaps, the best organised dissenters in the world today are anarchists, who are busily undermining capitalism while the rest of the left is still trying to form committees."
-- Jeremy Hardy, The Guardian (UK)