> Not what Carrol is saying.
Perhaps not. However, in light of the fact that he also shared this little anecdote
"We weren't about to defend a random murder by some drug dealer (regardless of who the victim was, cop or not a cop) -- but neither were we going to be put in a position of defending cops."
I think it's plausible to think that Carrol wouldn't mind defending a non-random murder by a lefty, even if there were no procedural questions about the fairness of the trial he received (much less substantive questions about the person's guilt).
> This is a disturbing case about which there are serious doubts. In those
> circumstances, those who share those doubts should
> voice them. jks
Not at any venue.
-- Luke