Where did I say that "movement journalists" should conform to "the mini-neo-politburo's prescriptions" because otherwise they give "ammunition to the enemy"? Produce evidence that I said so, or else desist from libel and slander.
The passage you quoted in your Orwellian response to me was as follows:
At 8:14 PM -0500 11/22/02, Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
>The point that I wish to make here is that criticism within the
>movement is and should be a two-way street. "Movement journalists"
>should be encouraged to criticize, fairly and accurately, the
>shortcomings of the social movement in which they take part;
>organizers and activists in the movement on which "movement
>journalists" comment, in turn, should be encouraged to criticize
>their articles, again fairly and accurately. Only then can both
>grow.
To which Liza responded:
At 1:30 PM -0500 11/23/02, Liza Featherstone wrote:
>This I definitely agree with.
>
>Liza
What's so objectionable about that in your view? -- Yoshie
* Calendar of Events in Columbus: <http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/calendar.html> * Anti-War Activist Resources: <http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/activist.html> * Student International Forum: <http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/> * Committee for Justice in Palestine: <http://www.osu.edu/students/CJP/>