abortion

C. G. Estabrook galliher at alexia.lis.uiuc.edu
Thu Oct 10 19:45:24 PDT 2002


There is no orthodoxy more firmly fixed in the American political firmament than that opposition to abortion belongs on the Right, while "defense of abortion rights" is the lodestar of the Left. But the conjunction may be accidental and only temporary. The commitment to democracy and an ever-widening franchise means that it has been the Left that has called attention to marginalized groups in the modern world. The historic task of the Left has been to include in political and civil society groups formerly excluded on the grounds that their full humanity was denied -- e.g., Africans, Amerindians, and women.

Most arguments that hold abortion to be an ethically-acceptable choice depend on the assertion that a fetus is not a fully human person, and therefore the rules about killing human beings (e.g., that killing can be justified in cases of self-defense) simply don't apply to the argument. (It's true that some recent defenses of abortion have begun from the premise that abortion means killing a human being; as the defender of civil liberties Nat Hentoff puts it, it's finally hard to deny that "it's a baby.") Physical dependency -- the fact that the fetus depends on its mother's body -- is often, curiously enough, alleged as an indication of the less-than-full humanity of the unborn.

If the Left continues to draw out the implication of its principles, it will discover the marginalization of the unborn and unwanted as for example it discovered the marginalization of women in the first and second waves of feminism in the 19th and 20th centuries. And it's reasonable to suspect that the discovery will take as long and involve as many contradictions as that concerning women did -- and does.

There are of course groups on the political Left who have drawn this conclusion. Elizabeth Cady Stanton wrote to Julia Ward Howe in 1873, "When we consider that women are treated as property, it is degrading to women that we should treat our children as property to be disposed of as we see fit." Emma Goldman thought that abortion was an index of the general immiseration of the working class, and the suffragist Alice Paul spoke of it as "the ultimate exploitation of women."

Contemporary groups with similar positions include the Seamless Garment Network that organizes against war, the death penalty, and violence against women -- within which they include abortion. A Feminists for Life group was expelled from NOW for deviance on this issue, and there are a number religious-based radical groups that are anti-abortion, such as some of those around the anti-nuclear direct-action group, Plowshares.

=========================

C. G. Estabrook

Green Party Candidate for

US House of Representatives

15th Illinois Congressional District

"A Choice for A Change"

24 East Green Street - Suite 14

Champaign IL 61820

217.355.7313

<www.carlforcongress.org>

=====================================================

"One great source of the strength of the ruling class

has ever been their willingness to kill

in defense of their power and privileges.

Let their power be once attacked

either by foreign foes or by domestic revolutionaries,

and at once we see the rulers prepared to kill and kill and kill.

The readiness of the ruling class to order killing,

the small value the ruling class has ever set upon human life,

is in marked contrast to the reluctance of all revolutionaries

to shed blood." --James Connolly

=====================================================



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list