On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:09:17PM -0400, Doug Henwood wrote:
> Michael Pollak wrote:
>
> >But besides the fact that
> >that 98% of such attacks were baldly imperialistic (and thus not what a
> >Senator would consciously want to base himself on (Oh yeah! It's just like
> >when we installed Somoza! See, perfectly legitimate!)), not a single one
> >of them could (b) be considered preemptive in the sense of preempting a
> >threat.
>
> And Iraq isn't either, really. Warner's right that the U.S. has
> attacked first many times, and Byrd was being sanctimonious and
> dishonest.
>
> Doug
-- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu