> It's not necessarily treating an issue as "less
serious" to argue that people have a whole range of different attitudes to
sex and maybe prudes and hedonists don't actually have to slag it out over the
non-legal aspects of sex to join forces on a range of economic and social
justice campaigns.
>
> -- Nathan Newman
Brava, darling. There are times when issues about sexuality _are_ about social justice--ie. paternity, adoption, tax codes, unequal enforcement of sex laws, etc. But that's not what _this_ discussion is about. _This_ discussion is about orifice fashion: I'm for rimming and proud of it! Let's build a political ontology!
Gloria Vanderbilt